AI Governance Assessment
An independent read on how well you govern AI.
An objective assessment of AI governance maturity, risk and accountability against recognized frameworks — with the gaps named and prioritized.
The Challenge
Policies exist, but no one has tested whether AI governance operates in practice. Boards, customers and regulators increasingly ask for an independent read rather than an internal assurance that things are handled.
Who it is for
- Organizations with an AI policy that has never been tested
- Boards and executives seeking independent validation
- Enterprises preparing for certification or customer diligence
What Regavon does
- Governance structure, ownership and decision rights
- AI risk methodology and impact assessment practices
- Policy coverage and control effectiveness
- Human oversight and lifecycle management
- Documentation, monitoring and reporting
What you receive
- Maturity assessment against recognized frameworks
- Gap register with severity and rationale
- Risk priorities
- Remediation roadmap
- Executive summary and readout
Value delivered
- An objective view of governance maturity and exposure
- Gaps named, prioritized and attributable to owners
- A defensible basis for investment decisions
- Preparation for customer diligence and certification scoping
Regavon does not guarantee compliance, certification outcomes or financial results.
Relevant frameworks
- NIST AI RMF
- ISO/IEC 42001
- Organizational requirements
Framework mapping depends on engagement scope, jurisdiction, systems and organizational requirements.
Engagement
Starting priceFrom $12.5K
Typical timeline3–4 weeks
Engagement scope and pricing depend on organizational complexity, systems, regulatory exposure and implementation requirements.